A nicer ƿaȝ of ƿriting Engliſh
As i've detailed on my about page, i have a number of typing quirks when writing English — but there are a number of other changes that i think would look better, but could perhaps harm intelligibility or make me look completely insufferable. This page is for me to explore those possibilities without feeling the need to spread them elsewhere.
I have been quite resistant to adding diæreses to words of Germanic origin — normally i spell it being instead of beïng, for instance — and to adding ligatures to words where there is no contemporary precedent — such as equals instead of æquals — but i have decided to abandon those prætenses here and use them whenever possible! In addition, a more oblique archaïcism that i approve of is spelling the root-final -c as -ck, as in magick and æsthetick.
Then there is the matter of the long s (ſ), a now-obſolete typographickal variant which i think looks rather fetching. It is uſed at the ſtart and in the middle of words, except under the following circumſtances:
- Before or after the letter f, so ſatisfaction, not ſatiſfaction, and
- After another ſ, so aſsiſtance, not aſſiſtance.
But there are more obſolete glyphs that i think could be quite uſeful! The þorn (Þþ) replaces þe ſequence th. Many alſo advocate for þe uſage of þe Icelandick eð (Ðð) for þe voiced þ of þis as oppoſed to þe unvoiced þ of þorn, but given our præexiſting orþography draws no diſtinction, and even Icelandick doesn't boþer wiþ eð at þe ſtart of its words, i have decided againſt it.
Ƿynn (Ƿƿ) replaces þe compound letter w; hƿile ƿe're at it, ƿe might as ƿell flip wh back over to hƿ, making it truër to its original pronunciation.
Finally, ȝoȝ (Ȝȝ) can replace boþ y (in its function as a conſonant) and þe digraph gh. Hƿen y is uſed as a ſtand-alone voƿel, ƿe can replace it ƿiþ -ie (ƿord-finallie), i, or, in direct Græco-Roman borroƿings and one-ſillable ƿords, keep it as y.
But ƿe need not ſtop at merelie making orþographickal alterations! Þe archaïck (but ſtill recogniſable) pronoun þou ƿas uſeful for diſtinguiſhing betƿeen þe ſingular and plural ȝous, and from þere it's eaſie to bring back þe accuſative ȝe.
An aſide on gendered pronouns þat ƿas too long for a footnote
One miȝt expect þis to be þe part hƿere i advocate for an unambiguous, ſingular, and gender-neutral þird-perſon pronoun, and indeed, if i ƿere given þe taſk to redeſign Engliſh from þe ground up, i ƿould do ſuch a þing — i þink þe eȝ/em/eir ſet ƿould ƿork quite ƿell in þat regard — but gendered pronouns ſeem to be here to ſtaȝ, and as ſuch it is mine opinion þat þe genderqueer praxis is not to advocate þe removal of gendered pronouns entirelie, but raþer to fuck ƿiþ þe ſiſtem by adopting neopronouns and oþer ſuch inventions, hopefullie turning pronouns into an open claſs of ƿords.
A ſample of þis reformed Engliſh, taken from Dickens' A Chriſtmas Carol: